<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mswhs.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/</link>
	<description>A server for the people !!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Easton</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7355</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7355</guid>
		<description>Correction:  I re-read the review and saw that it was the NAS device; mine was the eSata.

My comment on NAS devices (I replaced a Buffalo raid 5 with the Norco eSata) is that i/o is extremely slow, much slower that my WHS, and I wouldn&#039;t touch NAS again for that reason...I deal with storage and manipulation of several hundred thousand files.  Maybe the i/o speed problem was a design deficiency within the Buffalo op system</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction:  I re-read the review and saw that it was the NAS device; mine was the eSata.</p>
<p>My comment on NAS devices (I replaced a Buffalo raid 5 with the Norco eSata) is that i/o is extremely slow, much slower that my WHS, and I wouldn&#8217;t touch NAS again for that reason&#8230;I deal with storage and manipulation of several hundred thousand files.  Maybe the i/o speed problem was a design deficiency within the Buffalo op system</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Easton</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7354</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7354</guid>
		<description>A very important issue that Norco and its retailers forget to mention is that if you want to exceed 2tb you need to run x64 flavors of Windows.    And don&#039;t forget, it&#039;s joined at the waist to a workstation which has the sata pci card installed.  And getting the drivers installed and functional can be a time-sink.  And I lost a couple of drives when the fan seized up.  I will stick to usb externals; however, I must mention that I had 2 Maxtors fry drives within 1 month because of seized fans...

I dumped my Norco for WHS recently and never looked back...will keep my Maxtors realizing that they are TEMPORARY storage devices that require daily temperature checks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very important issue that Norco and its retailers forget to mention is that if you want to exceed 2tb you need to run x64 flavors of Windows.    And don&#8217;t forget, it&#8217;s joined at the waist to a workstation which has the sata pci card installed.  And getting the drivers installed and functional can be a time-sink.  And I lost a couple of drives when the fan seized up.  I will stick to usb externals; however, I must mention that I had 2 Maxtors fry drives within 1 month because of seized fans&#8230;</p>
<p>I dumped my Norco for WHS recently and never looked back&#8230;will keep my Maxtors realizing that they are TEMPORARY storage devices that require daily temperature checks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7327</guid>
		<description>[...] Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7295</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-7295</guid>
		<description>I said it way back when you first intro&#039;d this model... I love it!  The size is perfect, the case is so awesome... compact, and the 5 hotswap bays are just perfect, and I also love the dual rj45 ports... BUT, it&#039;s too expensive.  $599 for basically a bare bones system is way too much.  If this thing were even $499, I&#039;d probably still think it was a little pricey, but I&#039;d have one in my house right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said it way back when you first intro&#8217;d this model&#8230; I love it!  The size is perfect, the case is so awesome&#8230; compact, and the 5 hotswap bays are just perfect, and I also love the dual rj45 ports&#8230; BUT, it&#8217;s too expensive.  $599 for basically a bare bones system is way too much.  If this thing were even $499, I&#8217;d probably still think it was a little pricey, but I&#8217;d have one in my house right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
