<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you like Power Pack 1 sooner rather than later?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/</link>
	<description>A server for the people !!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Parabellum555</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-10684</link>
		<dc:creator>Parabellum555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-10684</guid>
		<description>Clock is ticking for over 4 months now, the wait gets a bit irritating. How much longer do we have to work with corrupted files ? I wonder tbh, what the contrabution is in this way of asking the community what we want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clock is ticking for over 4 months now, the wait gets a bit irritating. How much longer do we have to work with corrupted files ? I wonder tbh, what the contrabution is in this way of asking the community what we want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parabellum555</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-10325</link>
		<dc:creator>Parabellum555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-10325</guid>
		<description>When will the wait be over. Release the pack !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the wait be over. Release the pack !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waiting For Relief</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-9380</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting For Relief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 18:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-9380</guid>
		<description>Microsoft states anything you want to store in WHS, should be backed up, right?

And yet, Joel Sider, senior product manager for WHS stated, 
&quot;The server backup functionality won&#039;t include the PC backup database -- a separate data store on Home Server that keeps all the data from the PCs that home server is backing up every night.&quot;

www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9086258

&quot;Pack 1 could be available end of April March 13, 2008&quot; — Philip Churchill

It&#039;s now May 18th 2008, and we only have the rumor that PP1 will be released hopefully sometime around June 2008 via Microsoft. Is this the best we can expect to know for either PP1 or the proven data corruption design defect known as KB 946676?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft states anything you want to store in WHS, should be backed up, right?</p>
<p>And yet, Joel Sider, senior product manager for WHS stated,<br />
&#8220;The server backup functionality won&#8217;t include the PC backup database &#8212; a separate data store on Home Server that keeps all the data from the PCs that home server is backing up every night.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9086258" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9086258</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Pack 1 could be available end of April March 13, 2008&#8243; — Philip Churchill</p>
<p>It&#8217;s now May 18th 2008, and we only have the rumor that PP1 will be released hopefully sometime around June 2008 via Microsoft. Is this the best we can expect to know for either PP1 or the proven data corruption design defect known as KB 946676?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Pack 1 could be available end of April &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7895</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Pack 1 could be available end of April &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7895</guid>
		<description>[...] Pack 1 could be available end of&#160;April March 13, 2008 &#8212; Philip Churchill   As announced previously Todd Headrick the Product Manager of the Windows Home Server Team&#160; posted a question over on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pack 1 could be available end of&nbsp;April March 13, 2008 &#8212; Philip Churchill   As announced previously Todd Headrick the Product Manager of the Windows Home Server Team&nbsp; posted a question over on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7878</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7878</guid>
		<description>Technically, you can backup WHS! Since WHS is based on windows 2003 and the connector software supports 2003 (tested and working), you can just buy a second WHS and backup WHS-1 to WHS-2 *sarcasm*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, you can backup WHS! Since WHS is based on windows 2003 and the connector software supports 2003 (tested and working), you can just buy a second WHS and backup WHS-1 to WHS-2 *sarcasm*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elusivehawkeye</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7876</link>
		<dc:creator>Elusivehawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7876</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is trying a &quot;feel good&quot; approach to a serious flaw in a product that was obviously rushed to production. The data flaw has existed since the inception of WHS. As far as I&#039;m concerned, using WHS now is a crap shoot. Why bother when you never know if using it will lose your data?

Fix the bug and make WHS work with Vista (remote access) as is should have before it&#039;s release!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is trying a &#8220;feel good&#8221; approach to a serious flaw in a product that was obviously rushed to production. The data flaw has existed since the inception of WHS. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, using WHS now is a crap shoot. Why bother when you never know if using it will lose your data?</p>
<p>Fix the bug and make WHS work with Vista (remote access) as is should have before it&#8217;s release!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SP</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7868</link>
		<dc:creator>SP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7868</guid>
		<description>If pp1 is released in the next little while, look for another update around May then at the end of June I think MS will bail on WHS V1 and say they are going to concentrate on V2, the offering of pp1 is to pacifie and shut people up for a while, people we are being setup right now, the biggest clues are the time lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If pp1 is released in the next little while, look for another update around May then at the end of June I think MS will bail on WHS V1 and say they are going to concentrate on V2, the offering of pp1 is to pacifie and shut people up for a while, people we are being setup right now, the biggest clues are the time lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Higgins</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7858</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7858</guid>
		<description>How about what if any other programs are NOT affected by this WHS data corruption flaw? Being how almost every Microsoft software program, even the embedded Microsoft Windows Media Player leads to data corruption. 

So now we get a list of &quot;WHAT NOT TO DO&quot; when using WHS!

WHS is actually becoming more of the &quot;Don&#039;t Do List&quot; as time goes on, than when WHS beta testers were tinkering around!

This only goes to show how FRAGILE WHS really is. Who wants to work with WHS glass? 

All show and no go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about what if any other programs are NOT affected by this WHS data corruption flaw? Being how almost every Microsoft software program, even the embedded Microsoft Windows Media Player leads to data corruption. </p>
<p>So now we get a list of &#8220;WHAT NOT TO DO&#8221; when using WHS!</p>
<p>WHS is actually becoming more of the &#8220;Don&#8217;t Do List&#8221; as time goes on, than when WHS beta testers were tinkering around!</p>
<p>This only goes to show how FRAGILE WHS really is. Who wants to work with WHS glass? </p>
<p>All show and no go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7853</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7853</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a shame that the I purchased Vista Ultimate 64bit and HP EX475 (WHS) which doesn&#039;t work with supposedly the best Microsoft has to offer. Maybe I need to downgrade Vista like everyone else is doing just to get things working?

WHS should have supported Vista Ultimate 64bit, and the fact that WHS PP1 isn&#039;t going to be around until June 2008, sure doesn&#039;t help me out for having bought HP EX475 in November 2007!

Then there is this data corruption flaw that prevents me to be able to use WHS for what I had bought it for! I didn&#039;t want an $800 broken backup device that doesn&#039;t even backup itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a shame that the I purchased Vista Ultimate 64bit and HP EX475 (WHS) which doesn&#8217;t work with supposedly the best Microsoft has to offer. Maybe I need to downgrade Vista like everyone else is doing just to get things working?</p>
<p>WHS should have supported Vista Ultimate 64bit, and the fact that WHS PP1 isn&#8217;t going to be around until June 2008, sure doesn&#8217;t help me out for having bought HP EX475 in November 2007!</p>
<p>Then there is this data corruption flaw that prevents me to be able to use WHS for what I had bought it for! I didn&#8217;t want an $800 broken backup device that doesn&#8217;t even backup itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7851</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7851</guid>
		<description>Microsoft states anything you want to store in WHS, should be backed up, only without WHS PP1, there is no method provided to backup WHS. And we all know why we want to backup, in case Windows PC or WHS crashes, fails, gets infected and obviously for WHS data corruption as well. 

Just seems like the root problems in Microsoft software isn&#039;t fixed here, it&#039;s just another band aid applied over another to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft states anything you want to store in WHS, should be backed up, only without WHS PP1, there is no method provided to backup WHS. And we all know why we want to backup, in case Windows PC or WHS crashes, fails, gets infected and obviously for WHS data corruption as well. </p>
<p>Just seems like the root problems in Microsoft software isn&#8217;t fixed here, it&#8217;s just another band aid applied over another to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnCz</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7850</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnCz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7850</guid>
		<description>I post that I believe they shoud go ahead with releasing PP1 prior to the bug fix they are currently working on.  The Server Backup to an external source capability alone is worth the upgrade.  Not to mention there are some bug fixes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I post that I believe they shoud go ahead with releasing PP1 prior to the bug fix they are currently working on.  The Server Backup to an external source capability alone is worth the upgrade.  Not to mention there are some bug fixes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7848</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7848</guid>
		<description>Bugfix please!  Who cares about extra features when your data is in limbo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugfix please!  Who cares about extra features when your data is in limbo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skandy</title>
		<link>http://mswhs.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7842</link>
		<dc:creator>Skandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/would-you-like-power-pack-1-sooner-rather-than-later/#comment-7842</guid>
		<description>I want to backup my backups (funny expression) now. So yes i&#039;d like the PP1 to be released sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to backup my backups (funny expression) now. So yes i&#8217;d like the PP1 to be released sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
